With so much advance critical praise and positive word-of-mouth, Thursday night's premiere of Ugly Betty brought beautiful rating numbers for ABC. It drew 16.1 million people without piggy-backing on a big hit (though it was followed by the blockbuster "Grey's Anatomy") which made it the top rated debut series so far this season (I wonder what the demographic breakdown was).
In the age of YouTube, ABC is trying a new approach this year and allowing potential viewers who might have missed episodes of some of their shows like "Lost" and "Grey's Anatomy" (my current favorite) to watch them online - but only for a week after they have aired. This includes "Ugly Betty" so if you missed the first episode (or any future episodes) just go here a couple of days after that week's episode airs.
We certainly fretted about the debut in a previous post and expected to be let down (at first because we thought it would be impossible to translate Betty from its original Colombian television soap incarnation and then after the overwhelming advance praise since it was hard to believe the show would live up to the hype). So, how did it fare?
The good: America Ferrera is amazing! She IS the show and carries the true spirit of the original Betty. Also, most of the exteriors were actually shot in New York City (and Queens) instead of a make-up "NYC world" (see "Friends"). I also loved the character of Justin, Betty's 12 year-old nephew, who knows more about fashion and couture than any 12 year-old boy should truly know, unless... And then there are the telenovelas within the show which Betty's family always seems to be watching on their television set with producer Selma Hayeck vamping it up for laughs. Good stuff.
The bad: Vanessa Williams: I hate that the show has chosen to make one of the most beautiful and talented women in the United States such a hateful and bitchy villain. I also thought that it was a mistake to turn everyone else at the office into truly unlikable foes when, in the original, even the bad folks had a sweetness to them. Actress Lorna Paz (pictured above), for example, played a hilarious ladder-climbing "dyed-blond" secretary who would flip her long hair and have men fall at her feet (she can be seen flipping her hair here). She would splurge on high-commodity items such as a BMW and wear top-line clothing to make sure that she would look stunning and make people think she was high-class. But she'd always be borrowing money and, secretly, she wouldn't even pay her electricity bills (when inviting someone over, she'd light up a bunch of candles purportedly to 'set the mood' though the audience knew that without them her place would be dark).
We previously had said that some of the Betty re-makes lost something in painting their characters too broadly and robbing them of complex character traits and, at least in the pilot, the US version seems to have done this as well with the exception of Betty and, perhaps, her nephew.
The ugly: The humiliating scene in which Betty is asked to dress up for a fashion shoot was cruel, humiliating and unduly harsh. Gina Gershon's poodle-totting, silicon-lipped Italian caricature was humorless and distracting. The concept of a Mexican-family in Queens didn't quite congeal into a whole, and the actors playing them seem to be channeling members of totally different families. And, judging by previews of the next episode, they already will be cashing in on the popularity of "The Devil Wears Prada" with a storyline that seems directly lifted from the film.
OK, maybe some of that is not quite ugly but it certainly is somewhat disappointing. I'll keep watching thanks to America Ferrera and hope that, this being the pilot, future episodes will allow the other characters to breathe a little and hopefully become the great show that was promised. If only there was a little more Lorna Paz-ness.
A whole different take on the show at Miss Wild Thing's.
Other assorted takes:
Stop the Coup 2025 Founder on the Dangers of the Heritage Foundation’s
Authoritarian Playbook
-
The Project 2025 plan published by the Heritage Foundation is, in the words
of Peter...
2 days ago
Ah, classy! It must be said, though, that some hard-liners also speak against the homophobic remarks in the comments section as well.
On Wednesday, The Daily Pulp (as Norman's blog is called) reported that the best known of the ten reporters, Carlos Alberto Montaner, had sent a letter to The Miami Herald explaining his role in the scandal questioning why he was being named as one of the so-called "Miami Ten" when he is actually based in Spain and explaining why he didn't see anything wrong in taking the money (Montaner has been a long-time advocate for gay-rights but his logic is similar to that of Mr. Williams whan he claimed that it was ok to take the money since he was in agreement with the government's policies anyway).
Of course, the issue of journalists being paid by the government to espouse views that are beneficial to the government is not only an issue with minority journalists as today's Miami Herald continues to shine a light on. But why is the Latino leadership of this country so quiet on this travesty? Where is the repudiation of the compromise of journalist integrity that was carried out by some if not all of these journalists?
Ah! I forgot, some agencies have been busy know-towing to the Bush government themselves.
UPDATE: Reporter Oscar Corral is not the only one getting "love" from the extreme elements of Miami's expatriate Cuban community. The Miami Herald apparently deemed it necessary to run this editorial on September 15, 2006.
- N.A. contributed reporting from in New York City